3892 2005-11-06 22:53 Out of date performance data? 2009-03-19 09:32:13 1 1 1 Unclassified GRAM general 4.0.1 PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED P3 normal --- 1 foster@mcs.anl.gov smartin@mcs.anl.gov lane@mcs.anl.gov madduri@mcs.anl.gov smartin@mcs.anl.gov foster@mcs.anl.gov 2005-11-06 22:53:11 I'm concerned that the performance data at: http://www.globus.org/toolkit/docs/4.0/perf_overview.html are not the latest GRAM data. (They date from January 2005) Also, they still don't seem comprehensive at all. I think this is unacceptable. There should be a pointer to Mats' data, surely? rynge@isi.edu 2005-11-06 22:59:29 Please do not link directly to the results page. We do "break" the tests intentionally to test new things, and if there is a lot of red or lower than expected performance, it can be misinterpreted. I can help summarize it if needed. smartin@mcs.anl.gov 2009-03-19 09:32:13 Martin ran a set of GRAM4.2 performance and scalability tests. They are linked at the bottom of this page: http://www.globus.org/toolkit/docs/4.2/4.2.1/execution/gram4/qp/#gram4qp-performance